There's a reason The Inverse Cramer Strategy is a popular trope. Recent examples include:
Binance

Kyle Vogt (who apparently resigned for personal reasons, but still)

Given that Cramerisms are often seen as omens, should we assume that his enthusiasm toward Nvidia is a bad sign?

To make it easy, I'll resolve this Yes/No at the end of the year if NVDA is down ≥10% from today's market close ($499.44 on 21/11) at the end of the last trading day of the year. Bond markets close early on Friday 29/12.

*Obviously given Nvidia's position in the market these days, a Yes resolution feels like a bit of a stretch. Still, we can't underestimate the power of Jim Cramer to be horribly wrong.

ETA: target is $449.49