Will Ilhan Omar receive any additional "punishment" before the end of 2024?
6
51
แน€150
2025
47%
chance

Omar was removed from the Foreign Affairs Committee after controversial tweets in 2019 and now a resolution to censure her has been brought by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene over her recent comments apparently indicating she is in the US government working on behalf of Somalia. The translation of these comments has been disputed.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2024/02/01/ilhan-omar-sparks-outrage-and-censure-resolution-from-gop-over-controversial-pro-somalia-comments-heres-what-she-said/?sh=73ca2a9474b3

There have also been concerns about her breaking campaign finance laws in the past.

Will Omar receive any punishment for any reason (including censure, being removed from committees, impeachment, etc.) before the end of day Dec 31, 2024?

The punishment must actually be passed by the relevant authority. Impeachment without conviction would resolve as yes.

Get แน€600 play money
Sort by:

Would failing to be reelected count as punishment? Thatโ€™s her constituency punishing her. Must the punishment come from law enforcement or congress?

@mattyb Since I made it broad in the description ("any punishment for any reason"), I would agree that losing in the next election would be considered being punished by her constituents.

Losing reelection resolves to yes.

Choosing not to run for reelection or dropping out of the race would not, by itself, be grounds to resolve yes. If there was a "punishment" that led to her dropping out, it would likely resolve yes.

This is therefore somewhat tied to the below question:

sold แน€20 NO

@rolemartyrx losing reelection could happen for dozens of reasons. To tie the entirety of an electoral outcome to a nothingburger statement is a bit absurd. But that's, like, just my opinion.

@AlQuinn at the end of the day, isn't an election result the sum of votes for/against a particular candidate by their constituents? If we can agree on that, wouldn't a failure to get reelected indicate that the candidate's constituents were dissatisfied with their work and therefore "punishing" the candidate by choosing someone they believe will do a "better" job?

If you don't agree with that premise, could you elaborate on reasons a candidate would lose reelection that is not tied to their consituents' dissatisfaction with their performance? Curious what I might be missing that may need more nuance.

More related questions