I have already tossed a fair (virtual) coin and recorded the result. At market close, it resolves YES if it was heads, NO if it was tails.
I have also selected a timestamp uniformly at random between 1 day from market open, and 6 days from market open (market duration is 7 days).
At the pre-selected timestamp (or near enough if I happen to be asleep or whatever), I will select a holder at random to be the "insider" (see footnote for precise method). I will DM that user the result of the coinflip.
I will not bet in this market. I will not sell info, take bribes, or answer questions about who the "insider" may or may not be, etc. etc.
Precommit hash: cbe2ba0a741d526098e3244a14ec084b9ca3e75b254c76c7450a8808385f1a00
(at market close I will publish a text file with the coin toss result, timestamp, and 128-bit integer n that hashes to this sha256 result)
User selection:
I'll make a list of all holders (both YES and NO), sort them alphabetically (by utf8 codepoints), and select the user at index n modulo the list length.
Update 2026-01-04 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Bot accounts are not eligible to be selected as the insider and will be excluded from the list during the selection process.
π Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | αΉ2,168 | |
| 2 | αΉ468 | |
| 3 | αΉ468 | |
| 4 | αΉ140 | |
| 5 | αΉ101 |
People are also trading
Hey @retr0id , I don't think you did anything dishonestly but I'm having trouble getting the right hash out of your precommitment. I'm getting
e40a423aa0ce944e9c5f4be73209a5f72b3e601b770bb8d87509e4a0b8b93b03
from two different tools?
@SimonWestlake It depends! I think the conversation would open with an explanation of how this market was set up, and I'd ask my conversational counterpart what they think the market chart looked like. We can actually back test whatever hypothesis they have in the moment!
I also think that my observation here is notable.
gg everyone - resolves NO
precommit file + user list used for selection: https://gist.github.com/DavidBuchanan314/20057123524b063920b9db3a124d29e1
@SimonWestlake Yes I was quite impressed - the "boring" approach should have allowed you to drain the 1k mana from the AMM liquidity and nothing more
@Velaris This is probably not a glitch: you bought shares cheaply, and sold a large part of them for profit. This means you've spend little on your remaining shares, but have already made a profit.
I've extended the limit orders that sell off my entire valuation. They now expire 2 hours before the market closes.
I am the Insider, and this market will resolve NO. I am doing this in hopes of looking shady enough to scare someone into driving up the percentage so that I can buy more NO shares at a good price.
There is zero chance I would dump so much of my net worth into my faith in my ability to manipulate people. I'm absolutely not lying.
If you trust me, you've got a great opportunity to dump a large amount of mana into a market that will give you a same-day profit on it.
Let's keep this interesting to the end. Selling a small amount at 10% was reasonable enough, but given how much I've put in, I'm not going to sell the rest at more than 5%. Limit orders for my entire stake are up for the next hour.
@SimonWestlake Because you have far more NO shares than you can reasonably expect to liquidate⦠unless I buy them all off you.
Though if this has been YES all along youβve got nerves of steel!
@moobunny Itβd have to be someone else anyway, I donβt have nearly enough mana to be buying all that off you.
@moobunny Have you seen my net worth? I can't afford such nerves of steel (plus I just don't have them in general)
@moobunny Hereβs another chance to sell some at 10%, but after that Iβm tapped out.
I'm good. That will not serve my goals of getting people to buy YES or sell NO better than the extended pitch I just posted.
@moobunny it's pretty annoying that you'll get the first 500 NO shares that come from people not trusting me lol

