
Will more people at Texifold agree with Austin's theory about why hot places have better food than Rachel's?
6
Ṁ150Ṁ385resolved Dec 7
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Rachel's theory: more flavorful ingredients grow in hot places than in cold places (spices, peppers, citrus...).
Austin's theory: people have more appetite in cold places than in hot places. (think: Arctic scientists eat like >4000 calories per day). So in cold places, anything edible is plenty tasty. But in hot places, restaurants and cooks need to develop more flavorful dishes to entice diners.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ51 | |
| 2 | Ṁ25 | |
| 3 | Ṁ5 | |
| 4 | Ṁ4 | |
| 5 | Ṁ1 |
Sort by:
