Can be primaries or main campaign debates, and can be said by either the moderators or the candidates.
Inpired by
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ184 | |
2 | Ṁ127 | |
3 | Ṁ124 | |
4 | Ṁ98 | |
5 | Ṁ70 |
Happened during second GOP primary debate.
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/chris-christie-says-ai-presents-024845534.html
Also https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mAy39elTnIc&pp=ygUWU2Vjb25kIGdvcCBkZWJhdGUgZnVsbA%3D%3D at 1:22:2
0
@StevenK Resolves as YES, except in the (extremely unlikely) case that the context clearly indicates that the initials stand for another thing in every instance.
@StevenK Only if part of an expression such as "artificially intelligent system" or "artificially intelligent model"
@milanw But other phrases like "GPT-4" or "superintelligence" don't resolve YES even if part of the debate was clearly about AI, right?
@StevenK That's right. I want to have clear resolution criteria, and it would be weird and unlikely for there to be talk about, say, GPT-4, without ever saying "AI" or equivalent.