Recently the record was set at , 3.1M
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,105 | |
| 2 | Ṁ433 | |
| 3 | Ṁ324 | |
| 4 | Ṁ32 | |
| 5 | Ṁ21 |
People are also trading
@TobiasSowaaed If you bet in smaller intervals the bots will automatically counter your bets in almost all cases and you will get a better return.
@TobiasSowaaed if you are referring to the hand linked in the description, no. The question is whether the record will be broken again in 2023. If you're referring to a different hand, please link it.
@TobiasSowaaed The bet is if the record for the biggest pot will be broken in 2023 and it has already been broken so it must resolve at yes?
@TobiasSowaaed that's not how this site works. You can't make someone resolve a question in a certain way based on a technicality. The question will resolve like I said it will, because that's clearly what the OP wanted the question to be about.
@jameso Well I will argue that the title is very misleading then. Based on that the most fair thing to do is to resolve in N/A as it states in the guidelines? I have 60% networth on this😅
@Mqrius I did but the title states it what I thought it was in my favour. I’m a pro poker player and I know for a fact the probability of the bet is 0% based on the operator. So I sold 100% on yes and changed it to 0%. Ty to misleading bets…
@TobiasSowaaed This happens a lot though. Title and description and comments matter, and in case of ambiguity or conflict or undefined edge cases you pretty much have to ask a clarifying comment before betting everything.
@Mqrius I have learned that I have to know the intention of the operator before betting. Otherwise I will get screwed over like this bet we’re the operator don’t know how to spell a bet
@TobiasSowaaed it's like poker... use good bankroll management and it won't be a big deal