
Yesterday I submitted for the first time in gr-qc. I got endorsed specifically for this, since I usually submit to astro-ph (I have about 70 papers on arxiv, mostly in astro-ph.ga some in astro-ph.co some in astro-ph.im and some even in nlin.CD).
My submission is (admittedly) somewhat crackpot: “Reichenbach’s principle implies Mach’s principle.” Some people shoot first and then ask questions when Mach’s principle is involved. Also the article is not formatted in a traditional way (Introduction, Methods, Results, Conclusions…). I concomitantly submitted to the journal Foundations of Physics, but I did not write that in the comments on the arxiv submission.
Here is the abstract if it may be helpful:
Reichenbach’s principle of common cause states that if two variables X and Y are statistically associated then either X causes Y, or Y causes X or there exists Z that causes both X and Y. I show that a straightforward application of the principle to a system of bodies in inertial motion implies that our description of such a system is incomplete, forcing us to conclude that the cause of inertial motion lies in other bodies not included in said description. Given the need to be in causal relation with the motion of inertial bodies, these additional bodies must have dynamical significance rather than being mere bookkeeping devices. In particular there must exist at least one degree of freedom of these additional bodies that causes (hence correlates with) local inertial motion. This degree of freedom can be identified with time. An alternative to this picture is that the empirically observed correlations between inertial motions are due to conditioning on a collider: our own existence as observers. I dub this notion ‘anthropic inertia’ though I judge it an unsatisfactory way out. Finally, I show that my discussion of inertial motion can be generalized to arbitrary integrable systems once we transform them to action-angle variables.
Edit: I added “submitted to Foundations of Physics” to the description. Meanwhile the preprint was declined by ResearchSquare (some obscure preprint server that I agreed to use upon submission to FoP). This is part of their email informing me of that:
Dear Dr. Mario Pasquato,
Thank you for your recent preprint submission "Reichenbach’s principle implies Mach’s principle" to Research Square. Unfortunately, our screeners have determined that the manuscript type or its content is not suitable for posting as a preprint on Research Square. Please note that this decision does not reflect the quality or importance of the work and is made on the basis of our editorial policies with respect to content type and screening.