18
96
Ṁ4952077
1D
1W
1M
ALL
28%
The nature of intelligent life is to destroy itself
1%
Natural disasters destroy intelligent life
41%
Intelligent life is evolutionarily extremely rare
8%
Other intelligent life is too different to recognize
7%
Intelligent life is not evolutionarily rare, but we're the first ones here
15%
Other intelligent life is hiding / communication is dangerous
1%
Intelligent life inevitably loses interest in outside contact
Resolves when a solution to the Fermi Paradox is widely agreed upon in the scientific community in response to empirical evidence.
Get Ṁ200 play money
Related questions
Sort by:
hard steps:
1. getting a planet which is sufficiently massive to retain hydrogen for billions of years, but has a thin enough atmosphere for photosynthesis (we lucked out with the Theia impact shedding most of Earth's early atmosphere), and orbits at a reasonable distance from a stable star.
2. abiogenesis
3. eukaryotes
4. multicellularity
5. evolving enough intelligence to invent radio and build big transmitters before contraception/welfare/medicine induced dysgenics or nukes destroy that capability.
More related questions
Related questions
Is the theory of quantum immortality true?
21% chance
What is the best explanation to the Fermi Paradox?
Will the next Millennium Problem be solved by an AI?
46% chance
Could Fermat have had a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem?
17% chance
What Is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
Is faster-than-light travel physically possible?
13% chance
Is supersymmetry realized in nature?
22% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before we discover alien life?
56% chance
Will a theory of everything be found this century?
39% chance
Will the matter-antimatter asymmetry problem be considered solved by the end of 2040?
28% chance