Solution for the Fermi Paradox?
18
96
2077
28%
The nature of intelligent life is to destroy itself
1%
Natural disasters destroy intelligent life
41%
Intelligent life is evolutionarily extremely rare
8%
Other intelligent life is too different to recognize
7%
Intelligent life is not evolutionarily rare, but we're the first ones here
15%
Other intelligent life is hiding / communication is dangerous
1%
Intelligent life inevitably loses interest in outside contact

Resolves when a solution to the Fermi Paradox is widely agreed upon in the scientific community in response to empirical evidence.

Get Ṁ200 play money
Sort by:

hard steps:
1. getting a planet which is sufficiently massive to retain hydrogen for billions of years, but has a thin enough atmosphere for photosynthesis (we lucked out with the Theia impact shedding most of Earth's early atmosphere), and orbits at a reasonable distance from a stable star.
2. abiogenesis
3. eukaryotes
4. multicellularity
5. evolving enough intelligence to invent radio and build big transmitters before contraception/welfare/medicine induced dysgenics or nukes destroy that capability.

bought Ṁ10 of Intelligent life is ...

We are living in a simulation; intelligent life is evolutionary common, but not in here.

bought Ṁ1 of Intelligent life is ...

1st option but also interstellar travel is much more difficult than the "Fermi" paradox scenario expects.