This market resolves to the AI model that achieves the highest overall score on the AiderBench evaluation in May on the leaderboard [here](https://aider.chat/docs/leaderboards/). Rankings with two models will not qualify
Update 2025-05-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has clarified a condition for model eligibility:
A model must be evaluated on AiderBench by the end of May to be considered.
If a model is not evaluated by this deadline, it will not qualify, and the market will resolve based on the models that meet this and other existing criteria.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ300 | |
| 2 | Ṁ161 | |
| 3 | Ṁ131 | |
| 4 | Ṁ96 | |
| 5 | Ṁ62 |
People are also trading
@joanna What if unofficial evaluations exist that say that Google's model is better, but don't appear on the official website
@theshortbread Like if someone runs AiderBench on their own and finds a better result? I could be wrong here but I don't think the numbers replicate perfectly (see their Qwen3 write-up), so I would be inclined to not consider it