From now on, whenever I see an "EXPLOSIVE" political tweet on twitter, I'll make a manifold market on it. I'll check back in two months and see if there's clear evidence (imo) it's substantiated, or clear evidence (imo) it was wrong or very overstated. former resolves YES, latter resolves NO, if I can't come to a conclusion either way or there's no evidence either way resolves N/A.
The tweet: https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1658201258656759809
BREAKING: sexual abuse suit against Rudy Giuliani includes bombshell allegation Giuliani told alleged victim he was "SELLING PARDONS" for $2,000,000 each "which he and Trump would split" AND SHE HAS RECORDINGS AND EMAILS
A YES resolution could involve Rudy selling pardons to any individual.
background: I have no particular partisan affliation in regards to this news cycle stuff, and find all varieties of it to be tedious, even when they turn out to be true.
1,000not finding any new evidence or articles on this whatsoever, probably NA
2 year timeline: https://manifold.markets/jacksonpolack/was-rudy-giuliani-selling-pardons-w-9dd928c4f9e5
No evidence one way or another as to pardons but Borat: https://africa.businessinsider.com/politics/rudy-giuliani-asks-judge-to-toss-salacious-references-to-his-appearance-in-borat/3wcf5kz