Is the Reuters report about AI breakthrough Q* contributing to Sam Altman's firing accurate?
21
274
Ṁ4.2KṀ370
2025
10%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
https://twitter.com/alexeheath/status/1727472179283919032
Am hearing from multiple sources, including an OpenAI spokesperson, that this Reuters report, “Sam Altman's ouster at OpenAI was precipitated by letter to board about AI breakthrough,” is not true
Resolves to my judgement, whenever information that could resolve this comes out and consensus is reached, or the judgement of a moderator resolution council if disputed
Get Ṁ200 play money
Sort by:
@jacksonpolack That correction does not appear in the linked article, but I can see in this msn copy of the article https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/openai-researchers-warned-board-of-ai-breakthrough-ahead-of-ceo-outster-sources/ar-AA1knK64
More related questions
Related questions
Does OpenAI's Q* 'breakthrough' represent a significant advance in AI capabilities?
27% chance
On what topic was Sam Altman "not consistently candid" with the board, leading to the board firing him?
Will there be another major Sam Altman controversy?
60% chance
Will we learn anything in the next 6 months that would significantly alter the Sam Altman Firing Market's resolution?
27% chance
Is there a significant link between gpt2-chatbot and the firing of Sam Altman?
19% chance
Will the first AGI build on some novel aspect of the Q* 'breakthrough' that reportedly contributed to the Altman firing?
15% chance
Was Sam Altman fired because the board suspected he'd created an undisclosed AGI?
13% chance
Will we learn that legal risks contributed to the OpenAI boards decision to not say their reasons for firing Sam Altman?
4% chance
Is Sam Altman a bad CEO?
POLL