
Resolves YES if the count of alts that Isaac uses to resolve the market differs from the count of alts provided by a third party by more than 50. Otherwise NO.
I will resolve based on a third party that is honest and reliable in my best judgement. If anyone wishes to volunteer, please let me know. They are not required to be neutral in the market. If no third party count is available, resolves N/A.
If an exact count is not available but the third party is confident that the difference is less than 50, that is sufficient to resolve NO. For example, if somebody else (perhaps someone on team NO), whose judgement I deem reliable, looks over Isaac's list of alts and agrees that it's right or that there are few enough differences not to matter, that resolves NO.
Similarly, if an exact count is not available but the third party is confident that the difference is more than 50, that is sufficient to resolve YES.
Isaac stated "By the way, if anyone wants to volunteer to take over the determination of which accounts should be disqualified, I'm happy to outsource that to a neutral third party." If this happens, whatever count Isaac uses to resolve the market will be compared to the count provided by a third party that I deem reliable. It is quite likely they would be the same third party, in which case the difference would be zero.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ48 | |
2 | Ṁ33 | |
3 | Ṁ18 | |
4 | Ṁ1 | |
5 | Ṁ0 |