Will any more banks with over 500MM in assets fail in 2023?
35
76
1.8K
resolved Mar 13
Resolved
YES

Ie need the FDIC to step in and liquidate assets to cover depositors. Does not include SVB.

Context: Silicon Valley Bank was closed Friday morning by state regulators and put under the control of the FDIC, after a bank run and capital crisis.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/10/investing/svb-bank/index.html

https://www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2023/pr23016.html

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ593
2Ṁ550
3Ṁ402
4Ṁ303
5Ṁ267
Sort by:
sold Ṁ23 of NO

Closing this market as it looks like it should resolve yes. Do any think otherwise?

sold Ṁ57 of NO
predicted YES

@ChrisGillett First Republic coming soon...

Globally? Or just banks based in the US?

predicted NO

@SG Good question, I intended this for US banks only

predicted YES

Frustrating that they don’t specify the exact range we want, but as a sense of scale:

“As of December 31, 2020, there were 315 institutions with total assets between $400 million and $500 million, and another 136 with assets between $850 million and $1 billion.”

https://www.claconnect.com/en/resources/articles/2018/what-to-expect-when-your-bank-reaches-either-$500-million-or-$1-billion?ssp=1&darkschemeovr=1&setlang=en-US&safesearch=moderate

So to bet NO: Are you sure SVB 99th percentile mismanaged?

I think there is likely at least one other who did similar things and will have a similar outcome.

predicted NO

@ian Looks like we've got around 1600 banks with over $500MM in assets.

predicted NO

@ian Oh, and less than $10B in assets so it's excluding some mega banks.

bought Ṁ100 of NO

Betting No.

There were 4 bank failures in 2020, and none involved assets much above $100M. I don't think the current situation is significantly worse than the 2020 recession.

https://www.fdic.gov/resources/resolutions/bank-failures/failed-bank-list/

Also, SVB was a regional bank with unique exposure.

The next most vulnerable bank with assets >$500M is First Republic Bank. 68% of their deposits are uninsured. There's a risk here, but I think it's under 45%.

bought Ṁ20 of YES

@ChrisGillett Wasn’t a core issue with Silicon Valley Bank rising interest rates, which are “worse” than 2020?

Although I share your principled understanding that it is neither 0% or 100%, I think it is more than 45% likely that Silicon Valley Bank is not the only one who mismanaged the risk of rates going higher than projected (https://www.realtor.com/research/2022-national-housing-forecast-midyear-update).

I agree the strongest argument against my position is that Silicon Valley Bank had a unique client profile. We’ll see!