These things, for example:
Considerations:
The Democratic primary is expected to be highly competitive, with candidates representing a range of political ideologies from moderate to progressive. Voter sentiments on issues such as public safety, housing affordability, and economic recovery will likely influence the outcome. Additionally, the use of ranked-choice voting in the primary may impact the dynamics of the race.
1,000I find about half the time it's quite useful (e.g. by highlighting a single key clarification), but the other half of the time it adds a bunch of distracting noise (e.g. by repeating a bunch of creator comments that are not actually clarifications, just random chatting with market participants). Maybe could be improved if the AI was told to be more strict about what constitutes a clarification to the question (i.e. would people actually bet differently based on this information? And is this information that is broadly applicable enough that people would expect to be in the description or just general chatter that should stay in the comments?)
@ian Let the market creator pin important threads and/or comments to the description. This is much better than the horrible AI summaries
@100Anonymous Thanks for the feedback about clarifications, this is actually about the considerations sections, though. Authors don't remember to do things other than comment, so adding pinning to the description won't help much