GPT-4 (visual model as released by Open AI, first version, and without additional enhancements using plugins or whatever, and not another company using GPT-4 in their product).
Will it be able to tell if a square is inside a circle, or if a toy is inside a box when shown an image.
I've had only limited exposure to gpt-4 using a bot that was available on discord and not sure of authenticity, but it failed. I'll resolve when i play with it myself and give it 10 such questions. Resolves YES if it gets 70% of them correct. Otherwise NO.
It must do this with the images (png, jpeg, jpg, etc) themselves. There are softwares like webGPT which simplify web pages to text which let's GPT interpret it, but that wouldn't be allowed for this market.
If someone wants to know more about this, search for "visual grounding".
Hopefully i get access soon and this will be resolved but keeping the close date till EOY for now.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ856 | |
| 2 | Ṁ786 | |
| 3 | Ṁ124 | |
| 4 | Ṁ108 | |
| 5 | Ṁ99 |
t's really good at this. I've tested with some basic geometry examples and some similar to the Toy in the box examples like @NoaNabeshima and @Jacy have suggested below. Anyone want to suggest other examples before resolution? Anything that it finds particularly tricky?
@firstuserhere I'm happy to say I was wrong here. In the "car" toy example, the only thing it doesn't get is that there is a "plane" in the image, but it doesn't say it's outside of the box or anything. Good bets, all!
@NoaNabeshima I'd be curious how @firstuserhere would adjudicate between the "Yes" (inaccurate) and "in front of" (accurate) in the response.
Also, for what it's worth, I was imagining "if a toy is inside a box" as a test with an image that had a toy box with several toys inside of it and several toys outside of it. Here are two challenging ones (say, "Is the car inside or outside the box?" in one and "Is the soccer ball inside or outside the box?" in the other).
@jonsimon Indeed so, and yet this market trades at 88%, which tells us something about either the over-optimism or a lack of understanding