Do we have proof they didn't?

Is early 2024 till march or April?

@Liam2024Election "Resolution: early - means before 1 June, 2024" (is underneath the link/pic)

@MickBransfield Oh alright thanks

I'm still going for NO because NATO countries worried that supplying aircraft would feel like NATO was attacking Russia. IIRC Poland wanted to supply fighters but was stopped.

Yeah, we precede some of the events, let's put it this way. Same with Crimean bridge. We have a few more surprises with F-16s and other things.

https://youtu.be/mNgRrO9Fbrk?si=3WYg0kkCI6h4ExxZ

25:00 mark. He could be referring to existing Ukraine postage stamps of F-16s, but that wouldn't make sense given the context.

edit: admin how to delet my comment

Russian fighter jets suddenly falling out of the sky is exactly what the appearance of F16s on the battlefield would look like

@RemNi or F16s falling, maybe? It's not that Russia doesn't keep watch on what enters and exits Ukraine sky, and hypersonic rockets are there as well.

https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/ukraine-expects-to-fly-f-16s-in-combat-this-winter-7c0e29f9

Resolution guidelines indicate that if it happens this year it counts?

Ukraine Expects to Fly F-16s in Combat This Winter

Kyiv’s timeline is far tighter than the Pentagon’s more conservative estimate

@ChrisGreene yes, strict criteria means before.

Training began in August, and now approved transfer of planes one training complete (about 6 months)...

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-approves-sending-f-16s-ukraine-denmark-netherlands-2023-08-17/

US approves sending F-16s to Ukraine from Denmark and Netherlands

The United States has approved sending F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine from Denmark and the Netherlands to defend against Russian invaders as soon as pilot training is completed, a U.S. official said on Thursday.