Resolves YES if the average user can just converse with Gemini (via Google) for free, a la GPT-3.5, on and near release
Resolves NO if you need to pay a monthly fee or API credits, a la GPT-4
Resolves N/A if Gemini is never released to the public
If some of the model's capabilities/modalities are pay-gated while some aren't, more likely than not this resolves YES, as long as the full textual model is accessible for conversation (and isn't obviously just a worse model being opaquely swapped in)
Close date will be extended if it's still not released by then (but still in the works)
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ695 | |
| 2 | Ṁ578 | |
| 3 | Ṁ489 | |
| 4 | Ṁ423 | |
| 5 | Ṁ360 |
@SirCryptomind not sure i agree with the resolution since the base model is free and the creator never clarified any of the questions -> in my
opinion this should resolve N/A but all good I just lost 50 mana so it’s not the end of the world
@SirCryptomind by comparison, brubsby's other two markets on Gemini had one resolve YES that it released (upon Pro releasing) and the other be extended to wait for Gemini Ultra for capabilities comparisons.
I think it's fair to wait for Ultra, which I think most creators intended their questions to be about before Pro was released. Brubsby has demonstrated this by leaving the capabilities market open (this was deliberate, they commented to this effect), and they would have presumably resolved this one YES upon the release of Pro if it they wanted to accept that Pro was enough to answer the question (unless they just forgot about this question, of course).
Most Gemini markets are still open, and didn't resolve on Pro being released. But there has certainly been some contention about this.
I would probably extend, but brubsby is not that inactive, and maybe another ping or two would get their attention.