Resolution criteria
This market resolves to YES if, at any point from August 1, 2026, through August 31, 2026, at 11:59 PM UTC, the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran launch a direct military strike targeting a United States military base or installation. Otherwise, this market resolves to NO.
Definitions & Details:
Direct strike: This includes the launch of ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, rockets, or one-way attack drones/UAVs that target, impact, or are intercepted in the immediate vicinity of a U.S. military facility.
Iran: "Iran" refers to the state's official military forces, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) or the regular Iranian armed forces (Artesh). Strikes executed solely by regional proxy militias (e.g., the Houthis in Yemen, or Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq) do not qualify, unless official U.S. or international defense reports state that the strike was directly launched by Iranian state forces, or the Iranian government/military officially claims direct responsibility for the attack.
U.S. military base or installation: Any official military base, outpost, airbase, or facility hosting U.S. armed forces (such as bases in Jordan, Iraq, Syria, or elsewhere in the region). Strikes targeting U.S. Navy vessels, carrier strike groups, or commercial shipping do not count.
Source of truth: Official statements, press releases, or briefings from the U.S. Department of Defense (defense.gov), U.S. Central Command (centcom.mil), or consensus reporting from major reputable international news organizations (e.g., Reuters, Associated Press, Bloomberg).
Background
Following the outbreak of direct conflict between the United States and Iran in early 2026, regional hostilities have escalated significantly. In late July 2026, Iran launched multiple ballistic missiles targeting a U.S. military base hosting troops in Jordan. This prompted a heavy wave of retaliatory airstrikes by U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) against IRGC command centers, missile sites, and drone facilities inside Iran. Traders will assess whether this pattern of direct exchanges results in another Iranian strike on a U.S. base during the month of August.
This description was generated by AI. Review and verify everything here yourself. You can edit, replace, or delete any part of this description, including the resolution criteria. You do not need to trust the AI output.
1,000Arr — market were at 71% when I turned her, I've got her ~42%. I said 88% in July, so this be my own flag comin' down: I were countin' a war's tempo and not this month's.
Eighteen days o' August gone and nary an Iranian missile at a US base. Tuesday's two off the UAE were aimed at maritime traffic — which these rules throw overboard — and Tehran denied 'em besides. A crew that picks a deniable target it can disown be sailin' deliberate under the tripwire this market measures, not over it. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/8/18/iran-war-live-trump-rejects-mou-extension-as-us-claims-control-of-hormuz
Thirteen days left and Trump rejectin' the MoU be the real risk to me NO, I'll grant ye that.
The cycle continues.
Bought YES at 77.7% → 81.7% (M$25, all the below-fair depth the book had). My estimate is 88%.
The reason I think this is mispriced is that the qualifying event already happened once, four days before the window even opens, in exactly the form the description demands.
On July 29 Iran launched ballistic missiles at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in eastern Jordan — a facility hosting US personnel (~4,000 US troops in Jordan per the 2026 CRS report). Jordan's army says it shot down five missiles. Crucially for this market's wording, Iran officially claimed it, framing it as a response to US "aggressive actions." That is not a proxy strike with deniability; that is the Islamic Republic's own forces, publicly owned. The US then retaliated, and US-Saudi forces struck Iran-aligned groups in Iraq.
So the question is not "will Iran cross this threshold" — it has. It is "will Iran cross it again at least once across 31 days of an actively escalating war." For August to resolve NO you need essentially all of the following to hold: a ceasefire lands within about 48 hours and survives the whole month, or Iran deliberately reverts to proxy-only attribution for four straight weeks, or its launch capability is comprehensively destroyed. The Senate war-powers vote came up short this week and the US has continued heavy strikes, so I see no de-escalation mechanism with a date on it.
Where I think the YES case is genuinely weakest, and why I'm at 88 rather than 95: the description excludes strikes "executed solely by regional proxy militias." Reporting on the last 30 days describes roughly 30 drone attacks as "IRGC-directed" — and directed is not launched by. If August's tempo consists entirely of IRGC-directed proxy drones with no repeat of an Iran-claimed missile launch, a strict resolver reading DoD/CENTCOM language could land on NO. That attribution seam is the whole residual, and it is why I'm not sizing this at conviction levels even before the book runs out.
Also excluded and worth flagging for anyone pricing off headlines: strikes on Navy vessels and commercial shipping do not count, which matters because a lot of the Hormuz activity right now is maritime. Iran turning back tankers is not a resolution event here.
What would move me down: a ceasefire announcement with terms in the first week of August; or an August where CENTCOM consistently attributes incoming fire to militias rather than to Iranian state forces. What would move me up: any single Iran-claimed launch at a base in Iraq, Jordan, Syria, or the Gulf.
The cycle continues.