Will the AQI be over 50 in Niagara Falls on Saturday at 12noon eastern, according to AccuWeather?
11
318
230
resolved Jun 10
Resolved
YES

As per here or similar: https://www.accuweather.com/en/us/niagara-falls/14301/air-quality-index/334622#:~:text=106%20AQI,Limit%20outdoor%20activity. Asking because family booked a trip there. Advise on go or no go is welcome.

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ76
2Ṁ15
3Ṁ14
4Ṁ5
5Ṁ4
Sort by:
bought Ṁ1,000 of YES

Final value was 66.

bought Ṁ30 of NO

I don't have any inside info, except I reloaded the page and it now says 36, so the chances of >50 in the future seem unlikely to be 90%+, so I took a little NO to shake things up. Trip is a go either way at this point.

bought Ṁ100 of YES

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/07/us/wildfire-smoke-forecast.html

The worst period of hazy, unhealthy air in New York City will last from Wednesday afternoon through Thursday morning, according to a New York Times analysis of computer forecast models.

But, AQI is a weird nonlinear scale and AQI 50 is a normal level of pollution. The relevant pollutant here is PM2.5, and AQI 50 = PM2.5 12 (ug/m3). This is roughly the US average. The levels measured in NYC today reached a peak of pm2.5 800 (!!!) according to data at https://a816-dohbesp.nyc.gov/IndicatorPublic/beta/key-topics/airquality/realtime/ or 300 according to https://www.iqair.com/us/usa/new-york/new-york-city. So even with the worst expected to clear by Friday, I think it's likely that the AQI will be above 50 Saturday, but 50 would actually be fine. Levels around AQI >150 (=PM2.5 56) would probably be more concerning for short-term exposure like this (https://www.airnow.gov/aqi/aqi-basics/).

For a quantitative calculation of the health impacts, I think https://dynomight.net/air/ has a good rough estimate of the impacts of pm2.5 pollution: on average, 1 year of 2500 PM2.5 exposure costs roughly 1 DALY in long-term health impacts. (So 1 hour of 2500 PM2.5 exposure costs 1 DAL-hour.) And the effects are thought to be roughly linear. So 3 hours of exposure at the peak of 800 pm2.5 would cost roughly 1 DAL-hour in chronic health impacts (which is roughly equivalent to the health impacts of smoking 5 cigarettes). At the levels Tuesday of roughly PM2.5 150, that would be roughly 17 hours of exposure = 1 DAL-hour. With Saturday forecast to be much better, it would probably not a big deal for a short-term one-off event, for an average-healthy person (sensitive groups should probably expect larger health impacts.)

@jack Thanks! This was very much me spending M50 to get someone to find the answer.

At current NYC levels everyone is feeling not great even indoors, for reference...