The first time I encounter 'in the wild' someone I believe to be genuinely complaining about Claude Opus ending their conversation (as per https://www.anthropic.com/research/end-subset-conversations ) and providing the transcript of that conversation, will I think that the termination decision was justified?
The person MUST clearly be Big Mad about Claude's decision, or at least complaining, or it doesn't count.
Resolves to NO if I agree with Claude.
Resolves to YES if I do not.
Fully subjective decision on my part, no tears.
You may NOT intentionally share such an example with me in order to resolve this. If I believe that the conversation was shared with me in order to manipulate this market I reserve the right to not count this as genuine, or to resolve it so as to frustrate the attempt.
Resolves to NO if I fail to encounter a qualifying example by end of year.
1,000