Context:
MTG Arena is running its "Powered Cube" for the second time. Here is the equivalent market for its first iteration (with more details & context).
Resolution
This market resolves YES for each card that is top 10 by GIH WR on 17Lands for the month of January 2026 (for Premier Draft). (The link may not stay up to date).
Details
GIH WR (Games in Hand Win Rate): "The win rate of games where an instance of this card was drawn into hand, either in the opening hand or later." (source)
IIUC, both iterations of the Powered Cube are grouped together as the same set on 17Lands, so I'll be attempting to use the date picker to isolate January 2026 (i.e., just the second iteration).
If this data is not available for any reason, this market will N/A.
This market may close early before the results are finalized.
The top 10 cards for the first iteration of the Powered Cube were:
Ajani, Nacatl Pariah
Ocelot Pride
Time Walk
Parallax Wave
Black Lotus
Guide of Souls
Ancestral Recall
Sanguine Evangelist
Karakas
Phlage, Titan of Fire's Fury
Here's my attempt at creating a changelog. Guide of Souls and Sanguine Evangelist have been removed, and boros has overall been substantially nerfed.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ452 | |
| 2 | Ṁ440 | |
| 3 | Ṁ319 | |
| 4 | Ṁ45 | |
| 5 | Ṁ22 |
People are also trading
@marvingardens yup looks like it. nice to see boros a tiny bit less dominant.
but tbh what's extra impressive is that recall & bowmasters have such massive IIH (i.e., their GNS is bad, ~51%)—neither are super heavy build arounds (yes bowmasters with the draw 7s but often they're played separate from that), but running U or B when you don't draw your big power cards is still not very good. (time walk has an even higher IIH, but time walk decks often build around it quite a bit, so it's a bit harder to tell)
@Ziddletwix I think it's worth looking at the Played In Deck Win Rate. It's all Boros. The first card with neither red nor white color identity is Black Lotus as 64th!!!!! The first card outside of Boros color identity is Time Walk at 86th!
@marvingardens shouldn’t that basically always track the highest deck color win rates? I don’t play much limited these days so I don’t check the regular stats much, but the impact of individual cards is so diluted I’d expect that to hold even if the archetype is only a little bit better than the rest. Does this not happen in most sets?
(Absolutely not doubting that Boros is comfortably the best deck, it definitely is, but it does seem like the gap did narrow a bit, although the other archetypes are unfortunately very dependent on opening the best cards)
@Ziddletwix Generally yeah but (1) if you check other sets there's generally not this level of dominance, it's more than the most solved of standard sets and (2) you would expect Power+ to have a real, visible effect on win rate, and it probably does, but Boros's win rate so overwhelmingly drowns that out
@marvingardens good point, i'll be using premier draft (as IIUC that generally is the more widely played version with a much larger sample size). will add