MANIFOLD
[January 2026] Top 10 cards in the MTG Arena Powered Cube? (by 17Lands GIH WR)
9
Ṁ1.8kṀ7.9k
resolved Feb 2
Resolved
YES
Black Lotus
Resolved
YES
Time Walk
Resolved
YES
Ajani, Nacatl Pariah
Resolved
YES
Sol Ring
Resolved
YES
Ancestral Recall
Resolved
YES
Ocelot Pride
Resolved
YES
Mana Crypt
Resolved
YES
Orcish Bowmasters
Resolved
YES
Parallax Wave
Resolved
NO
Broadside Bombardiers
Resolved
NO
Mox Pearl
Resolved
NO
Mox Sapphire
Resolved
NO
Fable of the Mirror-Breaker
Resolved
NO
Tinker
Resolved
NO
Flash
Resolved
NO
Elspeth, Storm Slayer
Resolved
NO
Comet, Stellar Pup
Resolved
NO
Nadu, Winged Wisdom

Context:

MTG Arena is running its "Powered Cube" for the second time. Here is the equivalent market for its first iteration (with more details & context).

Resolution

This market resolves YES for each card that is top 10 by GIH WR on 17Lands for the month of January 2026 (for Premier Draft). (The link may not stay up to date).

Details

  • GIH WR (Games in Hand Win Rate): "The win rate of games where an instance of this card was drawn into hand, either in the opening hand or later." (source)

  • IIUC, both iterations of the Powered Cube are grouped together as the same set on 17Lands, so I'll be attempting to use the date picker to isolate January 2026 (i.e., just the second iteration).

  • If this data is not available for any reason, this market will N/A.

  • This market may close early before the results are finalized.

The top 10 cards for the first iteration of the Powered Cube were:

  • Ajani, Nacatl Pariah

  • Ocelot Pride

  • Time Walk

  • Parallax Wave

  • Black Lotus

  • Guide of Souls

  • Ancestral Recall

  • Sanguine Evangelist

  • Karakas

  • Phlage, Titan of Fire's Fury

Here's my attempt at creating a changelog. Guide of Souls and Sanguine Evangelist have been removed, and boros has overall been substantially nerfed.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ452
2Ṁ440
3Ṁ319
4Ṁ45
5Ṁ22
Sort by:

resolves to those 9 (+ Karakas offscreen)

@marvingardens yup looks like it. nice to see boros a tiny bit less dominant.

but tbh what's extra impressive is that recall & bowmasters have such massive IIH (i.e., their GNS is bad, ~51%)—neither are super heavy build arounds (yes bowmasters with the draw 7s but often they're played separate from that), but running U or B when you don't draw your big power cards is still not very good. (time walk has an even higher IIH, but time walk decks often build around it quite a bit, so it's a bit harder to tell)

@Ziddletwix I think it's worth looking at the Played In Deck Win Rate. It's all Boros. The first card with neither red nor white color identity is Black Lotus as 64th!!!!! The first card outside of Boros color identity is Time Walk at 86th!

@marvingardens shouldn’t that basically always track the highest deck color win rates? I don’t play much limited these days so I don’t check the regular stats much, but the impact of individual cards is so diluted I’d expect that to hold even if the archetype is only a little bit better than the rest. Does this not happen in most sets?

(Absolutely not doubting that Boros is comfortably the best deck, it definitely is, but it does seem like the gap did narrow a bit, although the other archetypes are unfortunately very dependent on opening the best cards)

@Ziddletwix Generally yeah but (1) if you check other sets there's generally not this level of dominance, it's more than the most solved of standard sets and (2) you would expect Power+ to have a real, visible effect on win rate, and it probably does, but Boros's win rate so overwhelmingly drowns that out

Please specify Premier Draft vs Trad Draft 17lands search parameters

bought Ṁ10 NO

@marvingardens good point, i'll be using premier draft (as IIUC that generally is the more widely played version with a much larger sample size). will add

my bet would be on Orcish Bowmasters

bought Ṁ10 NO

@JeffreyDeLucca added (I think it should be possible for anyone to add answers)

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy