Resolves to the number of markets created by me that @MattP comments had "dishonorable resolution" in 2022.
Note that the term has been used broadly to encompass not just obviously wrong resolutions but also potentially things like misleading question titles and somewhat ambiguous resolutions. See examples of discussion about this at https://manifold.markets/BTE/will-a-delegation-of-us-senators-vi#bec1sWxSzajNVO5drKKS and https://manifold.markets/jack/will-donald-trump-be-us-president-o#aGjPCxUrX6Pg0dSsXnc0
In the event @MattP changes his mind about whether a resolution was dishonorable, his final decision will be what is counted here.
Of course, this market is created by me so you have to trust me to resolve this accurately. If you think I'm unlikely to intentionally misresolve a market in a blatantly wrong way (which I claim is an accurate belief), then you could think of this as a market on the likelihood of me resolving any question in a slightly dishonorable way.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ50 | |
| 2 | Ṁ19 | |
| 3 | Ṁ5 |
@MattP How should I resolve this? If I don't hear anything from you in, let's say, a week, I'll resolve this 0.
@MattP I resolved this market improperly: https://manifold.markets/Yev/will-sirsalty-or-a-bot-be-1-on-the
yeah, after some more thought I'm solidifying behind that position. I'd earlier rescinded my "dishonorable" judgment on one of BTE's markets after he recompensed the traders who were hurt by the incorrect resolution, so in the case of a market where no one was hurt I think the consistent position is to say it was incorrect but not "dishonorable".