@Jack1 where was this announced? Has anyone received interest for doing this?

@Jack1 see the convo just below with MR ME. I'll managram you the answer cost

@creator You earn mana if you add liquidity to someone else’s market (trader bonus, fees etc)

I think this resolves as yes since new interest program pays money on anything in AMM

@MRME AMM interest increases the AMM pool. While yes, that could mean you get paid back more on resolution, it's not a direct compensation or bonus (and much too small besides).

@Stralor ok. I personally still think it should count but your call.

@MRME the key here is I want subsidizers rewarded for their contribution akin to how creators are, rather than simply subsidizing as a way to park mana and get interest

@MRME @Stralor actually maybe this is telling me I don’t understand the new system.

My understanding is that if I added 1,000 liquidity to a market that resolved in a year, I would get 50 mana on market resolution.

Is that totally wrong?

@MRME hmm maybe it is only on resolution. I've been a bit MIA. but that's hardly a reward on any market that settles the price correctly; you'd be paying 1000 mana to get 50, and it wouldn't have anything to do with whether the subsidy generated more activity on the market.

perhaps my option here is too vague?

@Stralor as is, basically the interest is just a rebate for creators for resolving their markets imo (if we're right about it being at resolution time)

@Stralor the option says: “You earn mana if you add liquidity to someone else’s market (trader bonus, fees etc)”.

To me, if you add liquidity and that liquidity earns interest, that is the same as a trader bonus or fee. Neither of those pays for the cost of most market either.

I’m not trying to be difficult here, but if interest isn’t in scope I do think the option needs more clarity.

@MRME you're not! it's reasonable for me to reassess it. did you take any losses on your trades?

@Stralor nope - nobody traded against me so I sold out exactly even.

@MRME alright, re-trade it, I'll resolve YES and try to get a new one that more appropriately covers what I'm thinking

@Stralor oh lol just noticed that isnt even my answer. well, I'm calling it

@Stralor lol done.

@Stralor 👀

@Stralor A genuine user? Or if someone exploited themselves from 10000 to #1 and got perm banned for doing that, Would that count?

@NzJack0n hmmm if they're banned and aren't shortly removed from the leaderboard for those antics I'd accept it

@MiaBerg Can you explain this more? Very curious

@Stralor @notrealDonaldTrump

@NotJeromeHPowell That's who I was thinking of too!

@notrealDonaldTrump Check DM's