Resolves YES with large-scale credible evidence or Trump/white house staff themselves reveals that the ballroom project is also an underground data center.
Resolves NO if the ballroom is finished and certainly contains no underground data center.
The underground portion of construction has to be on white house ground near or directly under the above ground portion of new construction replacing the demolished east wing. It must include a data center to resolve yes but also can include other elements.
Update 2025-12-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator will determine resolution based on how the underground/protected portion is presented or announced in credible details. If the language used is mainly "data center" or "data storage/processing facility", the market can resolve YES. There is no specific quantitative threshold (e.g., FLOPS/sec) for what qualifies as a data center.
Update 2025-12-21 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator will resolve YES with evidence that allows the informed public to be mostly certain an underground data center is part of this project. This addresses concerns about what counts as "credible" evidence.
People are also trading
@AlanTennant i will resolve YES with evidence which allows the infomed public to be mostly certain an underground data center is part of this project
@DZC no i honestly don't have an idea of a proper quantitative threshold like that. i'll go more based on what the underground or protected portion of the project is presented as my anyone who releases or announces credible details. if the language is mainly "data center" or "data storage/processing facility" then it can resolve YES.