Background

Many, including myself, have expressed concern over Adam, the creator of Poe (a ChatGPT wrapper/replica), also serving on the board of OpenAI. This dual role seemed to present a significant conflict of interest, leading to doubts about Adam’s motivations. Despite these concerns, Adam remains on the board, suggesting that our initial conclusions may have been premature. I am curious to see if Sam will make any public statements, such as tweets, retweets, or likes, that aim to vindicate Adam.

Resolution Criteria

1. Defining "public positive statement of support": This includes any public statement, tweet, retweet, or 'like' by Sam Altman explicitly affirming Adam's character or intentions. The endorsements should be clearly positive, such as stating Adam has a "good moral compass," "good intentions," or similar sentiments.

2. Time Frame: The market will resolve based on Sam Altman's public actions up to end of this year.

3. Verification Source: The resolution will rely on verifiable public records, such as Sam Altman's verified social media accounts and credible news sources.