![](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.googleapis.com%2Fmantic-markets.appspot.com%2Fcontract-images%2FShump%252F5536e9aca722.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Resolves YES if 3 people become angry and argue with the resolution, for example by saying it is bullshit, accusing FUH of collusion or cheating, etc. Arguments must apprear in comments either on Manifold or in the discord server.
YES holders on this market are excluded from the count to prevent manipulation. Other steps to prevent manipulation might be taken if neccesary.
I will not be betting on this market.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ64 | |
2 | Ṁ41 | |
3 | Ṁ38 | |
4 | Ṁ25 | |
5 | Ṁ19 |
@MarcusAbramovitch The question resolves YES if 3 people get salty, not just if there's a reasonable controvery. I trust FUH to be honest in a very well-monitored situation, but trusting 526 out of 528 pseudonymous user accounts to act gracefully is a higher bar to clear.
@MarcusAbramovitch I didn't do a count, but yeah in the spirit of the market not controversial at all
@IsaacKing No it's after. For some reason Manifold is not sorting this comment in the righr order but the stamp is from after it.
Anyways, I don't require the comments to be after the resolution. It can be before as long as they pertain to what they think it will resolve to.
@NicoDelon If comments from before count, there definitely have been accusations before, form multiple accounts, but maybe not multiple people.
@jskf I don't want to count something that didn't happen recently. I meant more like if someone commented after he posted the 99.9k or 100k screenshots, somebody already knew for sure they were going to lose their money and got pissed.
@Shump yeah I figured that would be what you meant. Commented as an implied request for clarification, and also because those people might show up again now that the market has resolved.