Will my upcoming post "Biological Anchors: A Trick That Might Or Might Not Work" get more than 100 Substack likes?
47
260
Ṁ18Kresolved Mar 1
Resolved
YES1D
1W
1M
ALL
Sometime in the next few weeks, I will publish a post reviewing Ajeya Cotra's report on AI timelines and Eliezer Yudkowsky's response at https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ax695frGJEzGxFBK4/biology-inspired-agi-timelines-the-trick-that-never-works . The post is about 10,000 words long. This market resolves as positive iff, within one week after being posted, it gets 100+ Substack likes (ie the little heart button beneath the post).
Feb 17, 4:30pm: On rereading this, the title and description are slightly different; I'm going to go with the title and say this only wins if it gets MORE THAN 100 likes, ie 101+
Get Ṁ200 play money
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ139 | |
2 | Ṁ104 | |
3 | Ṁ51 | |
4 | Ṁ33 | |
5 | Ṁ16 |
Sort by:
This should resolve to YES. It's at 101 likes according to this archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20220301024815/https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/biological-anchors-a-trick-that-might?utm_source=url
The resolution criteria said it needed to be at 100+ "within one week after being posted", not at the end of the period.
Doh, back down to 97 likes (I did confirm that it had hit 101) which suggests market manipulation, I guess? There's now an interesting ambiguity in that Scott could resolve to YES on the grounds that it did go above 100 by the deadline but I could also see the argument that retracted likes never should've counted anyway so if we end up below 100 then that'd be a NO.
This is a lovely illustration of the elegance of Manifold Markets's design choice to leave resolution entirely to the market creator's discretion. Market creation would be so fraught and frictionful if you had to think ahead to corner cases like this.
Post is up: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/biological-anchors-a-trick-that-might
22 likes within first 4 hours.
Of the 35 significant text posts (posts that aren't open threads, Highlights from the Comments on ___, guest posts, Mantic Mondays, ACX Grants, or link posts, and aren't subscriber only) that I see since September 1, 2021, 9 of them have had 100 or fewer likes. So the base rate for posts like this should be 74%.
Related questions
Related questions
Will I write a satirical tweet in the next 6 months on the “trust the science” discourse, that gets more than 150 likes?
71% chance
Will I publish at least 30 Substack posts in 2024?
75% chance
Will Substack articles with lots of comments be usable by the end of 2024?
46% chance
Which phrases will be in my next Substack post?
In 2030, will the majority of the top 10 blogs in Substack’s Politics category be written by humans?
87% chance
Will "Model Organisms of Misalignment: The Case for..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
64% chance
How many posts will be published to the Astral Codex Ten Substack in May 2024?
13
Will "Tips for Empirical Alignment Research" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "Introducing Alignment Stress-Testing at Anthropic" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "My understanding of Anthropic strategy" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
14% chance