Will I update towards a more positive view of auto-scientific-literature-review site Consensus in the next six months?
Basic
60
Ṁ4290resolved Jul 14
Resolved
NO1D
1W
1M
ALL
Consensus is a website/app that has a goal of "mak[ing] getting information from rigorous, evidence-based sources as easy and consumable as a Google Search or a Quora query". They kindly offered me the chance to test an early version of their product last summer - the results were http://slatestarcodex.com/Stuff/consensus_masks.png and http://slatestarcodex.com/Stuff/consensus_ketamine.png , which I was not very impressed by. Since then, their team has continued to be very nice to me, answer my questions, and put another eight months or so of work into their product, which I have not yet checked. They recently launched a public beta, which you can see at https://consensus.app/blog/introducing-consensus/ . My current guess is that automating literature review doesn't work (even hiring PhDs to do literature review barely works!) and that this project will operate as a slightly higher-tech Google Scholar that's not worth sacrificing the familiarity and simplicity of the latter.
This market will resolve as positive if, on 8/19/2022, my opinion of Consensus is significantly more positive than the above. I would certainly resolve it positive if I routinely used Consensus instead of Google or Google Scholar when investigating (some subset of) scientific questions, or if I heard buzz from researchers that they did this and really appreciated it. I expect that the Consensus team will continue to let me assess their product free of charge, but if not, the amount I will pay for a subscription in order to resolve this prediction market will be a function of what the prediction market predicts - higher probability of me liking it = more money I will spend in order to test this. This could produce weird behavior, but I think it's more likely they'll continue to let me test it for free and this won't come up.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000
and3.00
Sort by:
You currently have a loan of M$88.
nice, so even if this market gets abandoned I will get my funds back
"getting information from rigorous, evidence-based sources as easy and consumable as a Google Search or a Quora query" would be great, but my expected rate of this happening is at 0.001%
Doing it by paying actual highly qualified humans is not working well. Doing it automatically? Hahaha.
The easiest way to achieve this goal is to shut down Google Search and Quora.
Related questions
Related questions
Will I have a positive view of effective altruism on December 31, 2024?
17% chance
Will "Predictable updating about AI risk" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
53% chance
Will "Propaganda or Science: A Look at Open Source ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
33% chance
Will "Critical review of Christiano's disagreements..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
27% chance
Will "Optimistic Assumptions, Longterm Planning, an..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
34% chance
Will "Attitudes about Applied Rationality" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
43% chance
Will "AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentio..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
86% chance
Will "When can we trust model evaluations?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
20% chance
Will "Model Organisms of Misalignment: The Case for..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
86% chance
Will "Book Review: How Minds Change" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
14% chance