If you haven't thought about it, don't vote impulsively, please have a look at Historicity of Jesus on Wikipedia. Please don't vote if you haven't.
People are also trading
The present-tense "is" suggests that you want this to be about the big J still being a going concern -- a religious rather than an historical claim. But your wikipedia link suggests you are just asking about the "if we sent a video camera back in time what would we see" historical question. Can you clarify?
Please clarify your question.
Is it sufficient to establish the existence of a man named Jesus of Nazareth?
Are the only two events—Jesus being baptized by John the Baptist and being crucified by order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate (who served between 26–36 AD)—enough for your answer?
Or are you asking whether Jesus must have performed a majority of events described in the New Testament?