
Will I think running the Redwood Research Mechanistic Interpretability Experiment (REMIX) was +EV on March 1st 2023?
33
850Ṁ3896resolved Mar 3
Resolved
YES1D
1W
1M
ALL
See https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/nqwzrpkPvviLHWXaE/apply-to-the-redwood-research-mechanistic-interpretability
Context: I work at Redwood.
REMIX starts on 12/19/2022.
Resolves to N/A if REMIX is canceled (very unlikely as it starts on Monday).
Edit: ex-post EV analysis
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ114 | |
2 | Ṁ78 | |
3 | Ṁ76 | |
4 | Ṁ51 | |
5 | Ṁ37 |
Sort by:
@NoaNabeshima the criteria is "suppose we had decided not to do remix and instead used the resources elsewhere etc. Would this have been higher expected utility? (given ex-post knowledge about the quality of remix and what we otherwise would have done)." I might edit this into the description.
People are also trading
Related questions
Will Redwood Research still exist in 2 years?
90% chance
Will Redwood Research still exist in 3 years?
68% chance
By 2028, will I think Redwood Research has been net-good for the world?
83% chance
Will this market still exist at the beginning of 2026? (Experimental market structure; 99% displayed probability means 100% trader credence.)
96% chance
Will this market still exist at the beginning of 2026? (Experimental market structure; 90% displayed probability means 100% trader credence.)
85% chance
Will I Think Extropic AI Accelerated Timelines by EOY 2027?
11% chance
Will this market still exist at the beginning of 2035? (Experimental market structure; 99% displayed probability means 100% trader credence.)
46% chance
Will Redwood Research still exist in 5 years?
53% chance