There has been some recent media chatter about the Timescape theory, because of this new paper:
https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article/537/1/L55/7926647
News coverage:
https://theconversation.com/huge-if-true-dark-energy-doesnt-exist-claims-new-study-on-supernovas-246674
https://www.thequantumcat.space/p/the-week-in-space-and-physics-timescapes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xoDPPuhASGw
By 2030, will a majority of cosmologists assign more than a 30% credence to a Timescape style theory?
By Timescape style, I mean:
- Rejecting the cosmological constant or dark energy
- Rejecting the cosmological principle
It should be pretty clear but if not I'll try to email some people, and for good beasure I won't bet on this market
@hidetzugu Are you sure this is saying that the laws of physics are different? I didn't get that from the explanations I heard
@Ppau Im not an expert in cosmology... But from what I understand the theory heavily couples matter density and time dilation.
Other "inflation-solving" theories do the same type of coupling. The "variable speed of Light" theory for example proposes speed of Light is "matter density" specific radically altering c in the early universe.
That said, Im betting based on a feeling from a cursory look at what's being reported. We've seen non-mainstream theories pop into thr limelight from time to time. Most times, people keep working on them in the background but they stay in the background.