Which features will be introduced by Manifold by the end of June?
Features that already exist or duplicates of other options will be resolved N/A. Options that are more specific or general than an existing option are okay though.
Answers that are of the form "any change to X" don't include bug fixes, purely cosmetic changes, changes to the text shown in some location, or changes in the notifications you get from something, unless otherwise stated.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ464 | |
2 | Ṁ166 | |
3 | Ṁ57 | |
4 | Ṁ40 | |
5 | Ṁ40 |
People are also trading
Pretty certain this is NO, but I have no direct statement on it or proof. Does anyone object to the NO resolution?

I think so (also this post might have been after they were introduced, after they had been temporarily paused)
@PlasmaBallin i'm assuming the league stats page doesn't count? because that's existed from the start, but it's extremely limited, you can only check exactly within that month, so i'm assuming it wouldn't count
Yeah, if it was a new feature, I could see the argument for it counting, but since it's an old feature, it doesn't count
If I'm confident to the answer to this one, but don't get explicit confirmation from staff, is everyone fine with me just resolving to the answer I'm confident in? (I'm pretty confident the net reduction will not happen)
this works with ian's new hackathon project! the profit is at the top left of the graph when you search a user or look at your own.
(thanks @ian!)
@PlasmaBallin this will be super true once they launch the pivot changes but this can already resolve YES—numeric already had their price increased to 1000M (from 100M before) last week.
💔
[Edit: This was supposed to be a reply to a big NO bet on the return of manifold.love, but for some reason it didn't show up right.]
@shankypanky Don't worry, I never actually used manifold.love anyway, it just felt like an appropriate reaction to use for the end of site about love.
At first, I thought I shouldn't just put things that they've already announced here, but then I realized this one can go on because we don't know what the timeline is for this being implemented.
@PlasmaBallin Okay, actually I'm resolving this one N/A because what I meant by it was real cash prizes, but it seems like people are interpreting that to be a different thing.