If you add interesting answers, they will then be included in the survey. The purpose of this market is to get tips on unexpected things that might correlate with conservatism. If you add uninteresting things or things that are already shown by a lot of research to correlate with conservatism, I may remove them at my discretion.
I will be running a big survey on things that correlate with political attitudes, especially conservatism. If a variable has a statistically significant correlation in the sample with self-rated conservatism, it will resolve yes.
I reserve the right to add controls as I see fit when testing the hypotheses. I will use my own common sense about what kind of controls are appropriate for what kinds of hypotheses, based on whether the correlation is still theoretically interesting without the control structure. My common sense might be different to yours. You have been warned.
1,000@PhilosophyBear I see you're active - can you please look at this market? NA or resolve? traders need their mana back.
thanks!
@shankypanky I've written to the creator elsewhere too. I'll give them a little time to respond and then we'll have to NA if we don't hear back.
A few questions:
Is this just positive correlations or negative too?
Which statistical significance test will you use?
Would you consider normalizing your significance threshold so that a fixed fraction, maybe half, of the submitted options do or don't pass, so that they're not either all yes or all no?
Do options that don't get used in the survey, and options that have all non-troll respondents answering the same, resolve no or n/a?