Which reason will LWCW 2025 attendees cite most often for disliking the digital session schedule? [ADD OPTIONS]
11
1.1kṀ868
Aug 30
6%
Bad accessibility (hard to read / small font / poor contrast)
17%
Bad availability (responsiveness, performance, network problems)
14%
Hard to “scan at a glance” compared with the paper schedule
13%
Forced me to spend more time on my phone than I wanted
8%
Harder to modify than the paper schedule
16%
Cumbersome/unintuitive user interface
27%
Other

LWCW 2025 is replacing the lobby paper schedule with a web app. It will be accessible from personal devices and there will be a laptop/tablet connected to a screen in the lobby for anyone to use.

In the written feedback form at the end of the weekend I’ll count every negative comment about the schedule and code it into one of the buckets (or “Other” if it doesn’t fit). If a person names multiple negative reasons they will be sorted into multiple buckets.

Resolution – The single bucket that contains the largest number of negative comments will resolve YES; every other bucket resolves NO. If two or more tie, they will resolve in equal parts to YES.

If no digital schedule is used the market resolves N/A.

Anyone can add new answers. If an answer is added that is clearly a duplicate I will edit the answer to say "Duplicate" and resolve it as NO.

I will not trade in this market.

Zvi house rules apply.

  • Update 2025-08-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Bad Accessibility does not include complaints about cumbersome or unintuitive user interface.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

Does Bad Accessibility include complaints like cumbersome or unintuitive user interface?

bought Ṁ10 YES

@Omar Clear, thanks!

See also

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy