
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit | 
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ530 | |
| 2 | Ṁ75 | |
| 3 | Ṁ61 | |
| 4 | Ṁ41 | |
| 5 | Ṁ21 | 
People are also trading
@Noah1 https://chat.openai.com/share/46d73fa0-73d9-4134-bcb4-43b4fddb104e
I don't know much about how SCOTUS works. Tentatively I'm interpreting the question as more specifically "Will a Supreme Court hearing, with oral arguments, involving OpenAI and/or Anthropic in a nontrivial way, begin in 2024?"
I care more about reasonable interpretations of the original text of the question, not about what I intended the question to be at the time. If anyone thinks this operationalization is unreasonable, or there are other more reasonable operationalizations, or you interpreted it in a different reasonable way, or it is still importantly underspecified, please let me know.
I'm not sure where the threshold for involved in a nontrivial should be, for example.