Will the FDA update their regulation on the labeling of trans fat content ≤0.5 g to "Trans Fat - 0 g" by 2026?

120Ṁ247

resolved Jan 15

Resolved

ALL

Details:

https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/small-entity-compliance-guide-trans-fatty-acids-nutrition-labeling-nutrient-content-claims-and#:~:text=For%20conventional%20food%20products%20(those,fatty%20acid%20or%20cholesterol%20content.

In the US, the FDA allows for food to be called "not a significant source of trans fat" and marketed as "free of trans fats" if it contains less than 0.5 g of trans fats per serving. Will this specific regulation be updated before end-of-year 2025 to require the inclusion of "Trans Fat - 0g" on the nutrition label of products containing trans fat content ≥0.1g and ≤0.5g per serving?

(there can be a lower threshold for when the label is no longer necessary, but that threshold would need to be ≤0.1g trans fat per serving for this market to pay out)

Market context

Get

1,000

to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#	Trader	Total profit
1		Ṁ37
2		Ṁ25
3		Ṁ12
4		Ṁ3

People are also trading

Will omega-6 be listed separately on food labels in the US by 2030?

46% chance

Will Retatrutide (new obesity drug) be FDA approved by the end of 2026?

41% chance

Will the FDA ban xylitol before 2030?

21% chance

Will linoleic acid be listed separately on food labels in the US by 2030?

48% chance

Will the FDA limit microplastic amounts for food by 2028

14% chance

Will the FDA fully phase out animal testing requirements by 2035?

55% chance

Will the FDA ban erythritol before 2028?

24% chance

Will USDA/FDA have a labeling program for certifying food with low microplastic load by 2030

55% chance

Will the FDA ban any sugar alcohols before 2030?

42% chance

Will EWG update ratings to give significantly lower scores for foods in plastic containers by EOY 2026?

Sort by:

@mods Hi, I think the market creator becomes inactive, do you mind resolving this market?

@KarlWang in which direction? do you have something to support? thanks!

@KarlWang @shankypanky The modest amount of research I did on Jan 1st before placing my bet convinced me that this should resolve NO (hence my bet), but I may have missed something. Probably ok to resolve NO given no-one has presented evidence to the contrary nor betted YES

@Jasonb I did a quick search and didn't see anything that stood out for a Yes, so I've resolved No. if anyone comes with alternative evidence we can re-resolve but seems like the right outcome.