A genie offers you three wishes.
The genie is not malevolent, but he is indifferent to you (and so will not caution you against ill-advised wishes).
Wishes do not need to be simple, e.g. "I wish to be the strongest and fastest athlete in history" may be interpreted as one wish, rather than a sneaky attempt to combine two wishes into one. However, if you attempt to push the envelope too far (whether in the aforementioned way or any other way), the genie may take offence, at which point he may rescind his offer and grant you no further wishes (though he will not revoke wishes he has already granted).
The genie is capable of granting any wish, but he is not obligated to do so. He will not grant any wish that (among other things) might interfere with his genie business. For example, he will not give you the power to destroy the universe or the power to grant wishes yourself.
Traditional genie rules need not apply: he may kill people, revive the dead, or cause people to fall in love. He is capable of granting more than three wishes to a particular person, but he is not generally inclined to do so, and attempts to trick him into doing so will likely offend him. Attempts to curry the genie's favour (e.g. "I wish for both of us to get a goth baddie gf") are overwhelmingly likely to fail.
I reserve the right to modify/expand the above details if an exploit which goes against the spirit of the question is discovered. I may allow some exploits, provided that I regard them as satisfying the spirit of the question.
I have in mind a set of three wishes that I believe to be optimal, but I want to see if anyone can suggest a better set. For the time being, I will not reveal my set of wishes, as I do not want to influence the direction of people's answers. If a sufficient number of people feel that they need to first hear my answer before they submit their own (to see what they're "up against", for example), then I'll provide it.
If someone suggests a set of wishes that I recognize to be better than my set of wishes, I will announce as much (as well as stating my initial set, if I have not already). I will then allow some period of time for someone else to improve upon that set of wishes, and so on until a set is proposed and not improved upon, at which point I will award the bounty to that person.
Btw which sort of yudkowskian genie is this? Perfect, dangerous, weak etc?
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/4ARaTpNX62uaL86j6/the-hidden-complexity-of-wishes
Based on relevant smbc webcomics:
Infinite wish loopholes
Material pleasures
Pain upon others
Scapegoating