This market resolves based on the 538 polling average at the beginning of July. This market resolves one week into July to allow time for the average to have been updated.
If the 538 average as of July 8th shows Trump as having been in the lead on July 1st, this market resolves YES. In all other scenarios, this market resolves NO.
As of market creation, Trump is ahead by 1 point:
See also:
@DavidBolin Oz gaffed on abortion. I don't think Trump made any major blunders that could be used in an ad tonight.
They don't release the horse race poll adjustments but the Biden approval adjustments sum to negative 60 something, so if anything, they're making him look worse. Their methodology is spelled out explicitly. It's RCP that cherry picks, drops polls in ways that help Republicans, uses Rasmussen which is pure garbage, and tells us nothing about their methodology.
Your specious leap in logic bores me.
I want an accurate measurement that tells me how it works and not some POS right wing bullshi using Rasmussen. I want an average that weights for quality, sample size, and recency. I don't even mind the house effect adjustments or any of the other tricks, because they give me the data and I can work it out without those things.
538 is going to adjust and drop polls to get and keep a Biden lead.
@brianwang If you really believed that, then you would buy NO.
I donโt know how much 538 will adjust. I think Trump will have a small lead. I donโt want to bother taking the time for multiple callibrations. Manifold rewards picking near term shifts. I will look for near term mispricing before some change. I will load up on Things that are days or weeks from a surprise to the consensus
In the old days on PredictIt, people would notify 538 about obscure polls on the afternoon a market would close, so that 538 would update the average just as the market was about to close, consistently flipping the market to the opposite of what it had been up until then.
I once spoke to 538 about this and they basically said "we know about this, it's bad, but it's none of our business"
Presumably no one care enough about Mana to do this but this is also a prize market which in theory convertible to money.
Motivated? They're political scientists and mathematicians; they're motivated to do their jobs right. They're not putting their fingers on any scales. Their model tends to put more weight on fundamentals. I would put less. But it's their model, their call. But they're not changing it daily to keep Biden ahead. They enter the data and the model spits out what it spits out.