Background
The current ceasefire between Hamas and Israel is built on complex agreements involving hostage releases, humanitarian aid distribution, and military de-escalation. Historical data shows that ceasefires in this region have broken down for various reasons, including violations by both sides, third-party interventions, and disputes over agreement terms.
Resolution Criteria
This market will resolve based on the primary triggering event that leads to a clear breakdown of the ceasefire, as determined by:
Official statements from involved parties
Major media reports from at least 3 reputable international news sources
UN confirmation
The market will resolve to the answer that best describes the initial action that led to the breakdown. If multiple events occur simultaneously, resolution will be based on the most significant contributing factor.
If the ceasefire remains intact through the end of 2025, all options will resolve as NO.
Small-scale violations that don't lead to a full breakdown will not trigger resolution
If new significant factors emerge that aren't covered by existing options, new answers may be added by any user
Update 2025-22-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - If official statements from Hamas and Israel conflict, the resolution will be based on major media reports.
If media reports are varied, the resolution will defer to the UN stance as a last resort.
@PaulBenjaminPhotographer If the 1st has hamas and israel giving different stories. We will go the 2nd. If the media is varied, we will go to UN stance as a last resort.