Should be federal, or in at least 75% of the states & territories.

The word significant is vague, and I am keen to clarify. I won't bet on this market.

Update 1.11.23:

• Something like the recent USA executive order would count as significant, and the intention of this market was more or less to ask if Australia would have something similar happen

• It would not need to contain all elements of said EO, but be comparable in the number of different domains covered and the strictness of the restriction. In particular, covering multiple domains (ie not just focused on algorithmic discrimination, privacy, or biological synthesis)

• This can be done through multiple different sets of legislation

• The direction doesn't matter - eg if the Australian order weakens privacy protections, or provides protection for companies being accused of algorithmic discrimination, or allows free access to biosynthesis by AIs, this would still count.