Conditional on a second Wow! signal detection, what will be true?
18
1.1kṀ620
2101
43%
The signal has natural terrestrial origins
52%
The signal has artificial terrestrial origins
79%
The signal has natural extraterrestrial origins
22%
The signal has artificial extraterrestrial origins
38%
The signal uses a frequency in the waterhole region (1420 - 1662 MHz)
16%
The signal has a frequency lower than 1420 MHz
35%
The signal has a frequency higher than 1662 MHz
44%
The signal has a bandwidth wider than 10 kHz
57%
The signal has a bandwidth narrower than 10 kHz
34%
Signal is detected by at least 3 different observatories
46%
Signal has detectable modulation
44%
Signal contains an encoded message
12%
Signal contains an encoded message that uses the hashtag “#ChasingUFOs”

Background

The Wow! signal was a strong narrowband radio signal detected by Ohio State University's Big Ear radio telescope in 1977, originating from the constellation Sagittarius and considered a potential extraterrestrial transmission. Discovered by astronomer Jerry R. Ehman, who was impressed by its intensity and marked it with "Wow!" on the printout, the signal's exact origin remains unexplained despite several hypotheses and attempts to detect it again. It lasted for the 72-second observational window but has not been observed since.


Market Resolution

This is an open ended prediction market. Market will resolve based on credible media and institutional reports.

Market options can be added by me or Manifold Mods. If you have a prediction that you do not see listed, comment below and I will add it.


Disclaimer

I do not bet in markets I create. In the event that I am unable or unavailable to resolve the market, the market may be resolved by Manifold Mods. Any changes to the market description will be noted in the change log.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:
bought Ṁ7 NO

I don't know of any natural phenomonon that can produce a strong narrowband gaussian with an SD of ~16 seconds.

bought Ṁ10 NO

I'm assuming that human-built satellites count as artificial terrestrial despite technically being in space?

@ASomewhatRudeParakeet - Yeah, I'd classify that as artificial terrestrial. The general vibe I'm was aiming for with that category was "humans did it"

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy