Will "Towards understanding-based safety evaluations" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
1
23
Ṁ20Ṁ70
2025
10%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Towards understanding-based safety evaluations is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will "Towards Developmental Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
69% chance
Will "Predictable updating about AI risk" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
59% chance
Will "Lessons On How To Get Things Right On The Fir..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
33% chance
Will "LLMs for Alignment Research: a safety priority?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Deep Forgetting & Unlearning for Safely-Scope..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Cognitive Emulation: A Naive AI Safety Proposal" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
37% chance
Will "When can we trust model evaluations?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
20% chance
Will "How useful is mechanistic interpretability?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "Toward A Mathematical Framework for Computati..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
62% chance
Will "AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentio..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
83% chance