Will "Towards understanding-based safety evaluations" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
2
70Ṁ25resolved Feb 11
Resolved
NO1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Towards understanding-based safety evaluations is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ2 | |
| 2 | Ṁ0 |
Related questions
Related questions
Will "Towards more cooperative AI safety strategies" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
18% chance
Will "Shallow review of technical AI safety, 2024" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "Safety consultations for AI lab employees" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
7% chance
Will "Safety isn’t safety without a social model (o..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
43% chance
Will "Current safety training techniques do not ful..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
10% chance
Will "LLMs for Alignment Research: a safety priority?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "DeepMind's "Frontier Safety Framework" is w..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "The Checklist: What Succeeding at AI Safety W..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
36% chance
Will "Limitations on Formal Verification for AI Safety" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Talent Needs of Technical AI Safety Teams" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance