Will "Responses to apparent rationalist confusions ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
1
19
Ṁ10Ṁ70
2025
12%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Responses to apparent rationalist confusions about game / decision theory is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will ""Rationalist Discourse" Is Like "Physicist Mo..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
28% chance
Will "Basics of Rationalist Discourse" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
37% chance
Will "Attitudes about Applied Rationality" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
59% chance
Will "Against Almost Every Theory of Impact of Inte..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
27% chance
Will "Why Would Belief-States Have A Fractal Struct..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
40% chance
Will "A stylized dialogue on John Wentworth's claim..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
26% chance
Will "How useful is mechanistic interpretability?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "Elements of Rationalist Discourse" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
21% chance
Will "Critical review of Christiano's disagreements..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
27% chance
Will "How much do you believe your results?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
90% chance