Will "Picking Mentors For Research Programmes" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
2
120Ṁ64resolved Feb 11
Resolved
NO1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Picking Mentors For Research Programmes is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ5 | |
2 | Ṁ2 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will "The Median Researcher Problem" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Making every researcher seek grants is a brok..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
22% chance
Will "2023 Survey Results" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
2% chance
Will "LLM Applications I Want To See" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "What happens if you present 500 people with a..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Overcoming Bias Anthology" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Advice for journalists" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "Skills from a year of Purposeful Rationality ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
26% chance
Will "Recommendation: reports on the search for mis..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
9% chance
Will "A bird's eye view of ARC's research" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance