Will "Making every researcher seek grants is a brok..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
2
8
Ṁ20Ṁ140
2026
22%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Making every researcher seek grants is a broken model is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
Get Ṁ200 play money
More related questions
Related questions
Will "My PhD thesis: Algorithmic Bayesian Epistemology" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
37% chance
Will "'Empiricism!' as Anti-Epistemology" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
45% chance
Will "Propaganda or Science: A Look at Open Source ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
33% chance
Will "Without fundamental advances, misalignment an..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
48% chance
Will "Toward A Mathematical Framework for Computati..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
62% chance
Will "Toward a Broader Definition of Adverse Selection" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
41% chance
Will "Lessons On How To Get Things Right On The Fir..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
33% chance
Will "My experience using financial commitments to ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
36% chance
Will "The Learning-Theoretic Agenda: Status 2023" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
25% chance
Will "How useful is mechanistic interpretability?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
29% chance