Will "One-layer transformers aren’t equivalent to a..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

Mini

0

2025

14%

chance

1D

1W

1M

ALL

As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.

This market will resolve to 100% if the post One-layer transformers aren’t equivalent to a set of skip-trigrams is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.

Get Ṁ1,000 play money

## Related questions

## Related questions

Will "Transformers Represent Belief State Geometry ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

72% chance

Will "Toward A Mathematical Framework for Computati..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

39% chance

Will "Without fundamental advances, misalignment an..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?

46% chance

Will "What a compute-centric framework says about A..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

63% chance

Will "Towards Developmental Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

69% chance

Will "Lessons On How To Get Things Right On The Fir..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

51% chance

Will "GPTs are Predictors, not Imitators" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

60% chance

Will "Against LLM Reductionism" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

21% chance

Will "LeCun’s “A Path Towards Autonomous Machine In..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

24% chance

Will "A rough and incomplete review of some of John..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?

24% chance