Will "Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
Plus
0
2026
14%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2024 Review resolves in February 2026.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders is one of the top fifty posts of the 2024 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Related questions
Related questions
Will "Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Steering GPT-2-XL by adding an activation vector" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
51% chance
Will "Thoughts on responsible scaling policies and ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
37% chance
Will "Toward A Mathematical Framework for Computati..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
46% chance
Will "LeCun’s “A Path Towards Autonomous Machine In..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
18% chance
Will "Scale Was All We Needed, At First" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
21% chance
Will "Model, Care, Execution" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
22% chance
Will "Natural Latents: The Math" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "Responsible Scaling Policies Are Risk Managem..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Natural Latents: The Math" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
16% chance