Will "Good Research Takes are Not Sufficient for Go..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
1
1kṀ2502027
11%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2025 Review resolves in February 2027.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Good Research Takes are Not Sufficient for Good Strategic Takes is one of the top fifty posts of the 2025 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will "The Pareto Best and the Curse of Doom" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "The Median Researcher Problem" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Making every researcher seek grants is a brok..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
22% chance
Will "What Goes Without Saying" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
30% chance
Will "Recommendation: reports on the search for mis..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
9% chance
Will "Truthseeking is the ground in which other pri..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
70% chance
Will "A bird's eye view of ARC's research" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "2023 Survey Results" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
2% chance
Will "The Pareto Best and the Curse of Doom" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "The Leopold Model: Analysis and Reactions" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance