Will "It Is Reasonable To Research How To Use Model..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2026 Annual Review?
1
Ṁ1kṀ1002028
13%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2026 Review resolves in February 2028.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post It Is Reasonable To Research How To Use Model Internals In Training is one of the top fifty posts of the 2026 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will "How Well Does RL Scale?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
17% chance
Will "Model Organisms for Emergent Misalignment" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "The Best Reference Works for Every Subject" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Fiction" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
27% chance
Will "Good Research Takes are Not Sufficient for Go..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "The title is reasonable" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
6% chance
Will "Small Models Can Introspect, Too" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
23% chance
Will "A Case for Model Persona Research" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "Do reasoning models use their scratchpad like..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Do models say what they learn?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance