Will "Anthropic repeatedly accidentally trained aga..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2026 Annual Review?
6
Ṁ1kṀ1172028
13%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2026 Review resolves in February 2028.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Anthropic repeatedly accidentally trained against the CoT, demonstrating inadequate processes is one of the top fifty posts of the 2026 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will "Anthropic is (probably) not meeting its RSP s..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Anthropic, and taking "technical philosophy" ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
20% chance
Will "Anthropic's leading researchers acted as mode..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "What's up with Anthropic predicting AGI by ea..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
10% chance
Will "Re: recent Anthropic safety research" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "Unless its governance changes, Anthropic is u..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
10% chance
Will "OpenAI #10: Reflections" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
29% chance
Will "Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating L..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Training AGI in Secret would be Unsafe and Un..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "Training a Reward Hacker Despite Perfect Labels" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
15% chance